What is considered an additional tenet of Joint Operations?

The concept of restraint as an additional tenet of Joint Operations emphasizes the importance of exercising judicious control over the use of military force. It reflects a broader strategic approach in which commanders consider the potential consequences of their actions, both in terms of operational effectiveness and the broader political implications. Restraint is particularly relevant in joint operations, as it serves to maintain civil-military relations and minimize collateral damage, ensuring that military actions align with national objectives and values.

This tenet reinforces the need for coherence in how military force is applied, fostering a strategic environment where decisions are made with a careful assessment of risks and benefits. Restraint can also enhance partnerships with allies and local populations, improving the legitimacy and efficacy of military operations.

In this context, the other options represent key principles of military strategy, but they do not capture the nuanced judgment that restraint entails. While surprise, unity of command, and maneuver are all vital in achieving military objectives, restraint brings a layered perspective that is essential for modern joint operations, where the strategic landscape demands both effectiveness and ethical considerations.